Last Thursday Washington, DC announced they’re powering up a 100-gig network, funded in large part by broadband stimulus money. If I’m not mistaken they’re the only urban area to get money for an infrastructure project. That’s kind of a pity since urban areas have some pressing infrastructure needs that get ignored by the media. But more on that in a future post.
This week I tackled another challenging issue represented by the DC deal that gets ignored by much of the media, and probably policymakers as well. What do you do about connecting all of these middle mile projects to last mile (or first mile, as my UK friends regularly remind me) projects? Huh. You say you haven’t heard about a lot of projects connecting consumers and businesses to those stimulus-funded middle mile buildouts? That’s my point.
We’re running the risk of having a lot of project teams complete thousands of miles of buildouts late next year, and then start scratching their heads wondering where are all the grateful citizenry coming out to greet them. But the truth of the matter is, if the Feds are spending billions to build middle mile infrastructure that private sector companies refused to do, why do they assume those same private providers will build the last mile? We easily could end up stuck with “well, we can’t make the business case for wiring your [take your pick] small town, rural county, low-income neighborhoods either. So we’re not gonna do it”
I talk about this in more detail on GigaOm, and using DC as an example lay out some potential last mile-to-middle-mile connection strategies communities may want to consider. There’s also a post on one of the DC blogs that lists some other issues that need to be addressed. The bottom line is, whether you’re an urban area or a rural community, it’s likely you’re going to have to get firmly settled into the driver’s seat and forge your own last mile path.
A good story to pay attention to as developments unfold is Wired West. The Co-Chair of this western Massachusetts coalition of 42 small towns and townships, Monica Webb, was a guest on my show, Gigabit Nation and described why these communities are building their own last mile. There’s a huge middle mile network coming their way, but given those communities’ depressing experience of constant rejections by Verizon, they’re going to take control of the deployment process rather than hear “no” again. It does pretty much suck, though, that they have to worry about stimulus money funding a private sector provider that could end up cherry picking Wired West’s best customers.
It’s still early in the game, so Wired West hasn’t settled on a business model yet. However, it seems a public private partnership in which a private provider rides on top of an Wired West-owned open access network is the ideal situation from the standpoint of residents and every business except the large telecom & cable companies. Consumers and local businesses get the kind of broadband services that benefit their lives and potentially their economic well-being. Local governments benefit in a myriad of ways. Private providers get to offer services 1) without the cost of building the infrastructure, which generates ROI sooner, and 2) in the long run benefit from a competitive environment. This scenario would likely play well for urban areas too, such as in DC.
The rain that falls on this parade for many communities, of course, are the entrenched incumbents who myopically believe that smaller, local providers doing well can only mean that the big companies lose. Since you can’t blow incumbents off of this position with dynamite, how well the first mile strategies work out depends on how much fight, political willpower and creativity consumers, local businesses and sensible service providers bring to bear.
Filed under: Administration, Broadband stimulus, General analysis, Network business planning, public private partnership, Strategic thinking | Tagged: Broadband stimulus, broadband strategy, community broadband, craig settles, digital divide, municipal broadband, rural broadband |